Sunday, February 20, 2011

Table Three

At table three the different roles within each group was awarded a corresponding ammount of chips. Each group had the same ammount, however the different roles had different ammounts. In front of the participants was drawn 8 arrows, each with a word (Nature, Health etc) and they were to place their chips on the values they thought were important. And more chips = more important.
The different groups acted differently. One group was very coherent and talked to each other and pretty much agreed on everything. One group was quite quiet and placed their chips before saying why and one group was a mixture between the two, where some of the roles talked to each other and some didn't. We did get some valuable input from this but the real test is to do it with actual people rather than people who has to try and act according to a role. All in all it was a good exercise and we got some good input during the critique afterwards.

No comments:

Post a Comment